How Policy Constraints, Not Just Production Bottlenecks, Threaten Your Bottom Line

Every business system is constrained in some way.  Veryable’s previous blog covered the basics of the Theory of Constraints (TOC) and its relationship with operations and on-demand labor.  

‍

The purpose of this article is to further explore how some constraints can prevent scaling up while others can prevent scaling down.  One might initially ask, which one is more important to solve?    

1. The constraint that keeps the operation from getting the resources it needs
2. The constraint that commits the operation to far more resources than needed

‍

The answer is “it depends”, but both have major potential to sink the ship. In many cases, like we have seen over the last two years, overcommitment of resources can quickly put a company’s financial health in jeopardy when business activity drops off.  

‍

As an analogy, think of a bus with a stuck gas pedal that is speeding along and will soon run out of highway and possibly crash. The bus needs the ability to slow down and off-ramp but it can’t.  This scenario is much scarier than a bus that is sitting on the side of the road because it ran out of gas. Adding more gas simply gets the bus moving again.      

‍

According to Dr. Eliyahu M. Goldratt’s TOC, the goal is always to maximize throughput while minimizing inventory and operational expense. While most people think of constraints as physical bottlenecks such as a slow machine or a lack of raw materials, the most insidious constraints are often not physical at all. They are Policy Constraints: meaning rigid, self-imposed rules, measurements, or traditional management philosophies that limit how fast a system can react.

‍

‍

Policy Constraint: The Fixed-Cost Fallacy

The traditional, circa 1985, approach to manufacturing workforce planning is to maintain a high, fixed full-time headcount, assuming this is necessary for stability, loyalty and Service protection.  While admirable in theory, this becomes a dangerous Policy Constraint when the market shifts downward and demand drops off.

‍

In TOC terms, this policy forces a company to accept high operational expenses regardless of market conditions and resulting demand at the facility.  When resources are overallocated, productivity metrics like Cost per Unit and Labor as a % of Sales deteriorate rapidly.  A Fixed-Cost model also fails the test of Downcycle Agility, which is the ability to respond quickly and cost-effectively to a drop in demand.

‍

When the market slumps, the fixed-labor policy leaves the company with excess capacity and unnecessarily high costs, immediately eroding profit margins. This rigid cost structure forces companies into a brutal response: Layoffs.

‍

‍

The Agility Killer: Why Layoffs Are a Triple Failure

Mass layoffs are the clearest sign that a fixed-labor model has become a fatal constraint. This failure is threefold:

1. Overstaffing and Idle Hours: The company was likely overstaffed and wasting labor resources long before leadership finally decided to finally pull the trigger on layoffs.  
2. Immediate Financial Drain: The company loses valuable employee investment, incurs separation costs, and suffers declining morale among the remaining team.
3. The Repeat Failure: When demand eventually rebounds, the company becomes constrained again by a slow, expensive hiring process. It cannot scale up fast enough, leading to costly overtime, missed revenue opportunities, and an inability to capitalize on a market recovery.

The rigid labor policy, therefore, prevents the entire system from achieving agility both on the way down and on the way back up.

‍

‍

The Solution: Exploiting and Elevating the Constraint

The only way to achieve true Downcycle Agility is to break the Policy Constraint of fixed labor.  This requires moving from a fixed-cost labor model to a variable-cost model.

‍

This is where Veryable's on-demand labor marketplace provides the solution to Exploit and Elevate this critical constraint.

‍

Instead of maintaining a massive headcount that sits idle during slow periods, a company can operate with a lean core staff and tap into a readily available, skilled labor pool as needed.

‍

This shift delivers two critical benefits:

• Matches Cost to Throughput: Labor costs become a variable expense that scales directly with revenue, immediately protecting margins during downturns.

• Enables Instant Scaling: The capacity constraint is removed. When demand spikes, companies can scale up in days rather than months, capturing opportunities that slower, more constrained competitors miss.

‍

In the end, Goldratt’s lesson remains the same. A system is only as strong as its weakest link. For modern manufacturers and logistics companies, that link is often a rigid policy governing how labor is sourced and managed. By leveraging solutions like Veryable to introduce labor flexibility, companies can break this Policy Constraint, unlock Downcycle Agility, and sustain continuous improvement and profitability through any economic climate.